Getting Root with Benign AppStore Apps
Comments on “Getting Root with Benign AppStore Apps”
Claim-checked. Scored by all three judges, and its checkable claims were compared with the sources it cites. How far stories are checked
A researcher's write-up walks through discovering dylib hijacking flaws in macOS apps, using Patrick Wardle's scanner to find weak-loaded and rpath-dependent libraries that an attacker can replace with a malicious one.
Why it ranked
No. 26 of 93 with a score of 0.63. The panel rated it highest on new information (0.94) and technical depth (0.92), lowest on audience breadth (0.46). The judges disagreed most on reader interest (spread 0.54), so the story is marked contested.
Every answer behind this is in the table under Score.
Score
0.63total under rubric v2.2Contestedjudges differ by 0.54 on reader interest
- Significance0.57
- Reader interest0.70
- Audience breadth0.46
- Practical relevance0.63
- Substantiated0.86
- Technical depth0.92
- New information0.94
- Counts against: Promotional0.03
- Counts against: Overclaim0.23
Each judge’s answer per question (0–1), their mean and spread, and what the question adds to the score (weight × mean).
| Question | Judge 1 | Judge 2 | Judge 3 | Mean | Spread | Weight | Contribution (weight times mean) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significance | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.22 | +0.24 | +0.138 |
| Reader interest | 0.36 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.54 , above the contested threshold | +0.26 | +0.183 |
| Audience breadth | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.08 | +0.13 | +0.060 |
| Practical relevance | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.23 | +0.22 | +0.139 |
| Substantiated | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.03 | +0.05 | +0.043 |
| Technical depth | 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.14 | +0.05 | +0.046 |
| New information | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.08 | +0.05 | +0.047 |
| Promotional | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | −0.19 | −0.006 |
| Overclaim | 0.41 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.29 | −0.11 | −0.025 |
| Sum of contributions | +0.625 | ||||||
| Claim-check penalty | 0.000 | ||||||
| Total, as published | 0.625 | ||||||
Spread is the highest minus the lowest judge answer. marks a spread above 0.40: the judges disagree, and the story is marked contested.
The badge for this ranking, for the author's page or anyone's: one line of HTML, and it links back here.
<a href="https://rubric.hrih.si/editions/2026-10-25/26/"><img src="https://rubric.hrih.si/badge/2026-10-25/26.svg" alt="Ranked #26 on Rubric, 25 Oct 2026" width="245" height="28"></a>Claim check
Claim check: no checkable claims. Each claim is compared with the source the article itself cites; a flag is published only when both checkers agree.
No checkable claims were extracted from this story.
Also covered by
No other coverage was clustered with this story.
Elsewhere
Elsewhere: HN —
Recorded for context only, checked 25 Oct 2026, 05:46 UTC. It played no part in the ranking.