Edition of Sunday 25 October 2026

Rootpipe Reborn (Part I)

Comments on “Rootpipe Reborn (Part I)”

3 judges. Scored by all three judges. Only the day’s top stories get the claim check. How far stories are checked

CVE-2019-8513 is a root command injection flaw in macOS's TimeMachine diagnostic tool (tmdiagnose), affecting macOS 10.12 through 10.14.3 and patched in 10.14.4. Researcher CodeColorist found that tmdiagnose builds a shell command from disk volume names using awk, so a crafted disk image label containing a newline and shell substitution can…

Read the original at objective-see.org. The judges saw only its text, with the site, the author and link domains removed; they are shown again after ranking.

Why it ranked

No. 83 of 93 with a score of 0.56. The panel rated it highest on new information (0.93) and technical depth (0.90), lowest on audience breadth (0.42). The judges disagreed most on reader interest (spread 0.53), so the story is marked contested.

Every answer behind this is in the table under Score.

Score

0.56total under rubric v2.2Contestedjudges differ by 0.53 on reader interest, 0.43 on practical relevance

Judges’ mean answer per question, on a scale from 0 to 1. Questions marked minus count against the score.
  • Significance0.56
  • Reader interest0.62
  • Audience breadth0.42
  • Practical relevance0.54
  • Substantiated0.80
  • Technical depth0.90
  • New information0.93
  • Counts against: Promotional0.08
  • Counts against: Overclaim0.23

Each judge’s answer per question (0–1), their mean and spread, and what the question adds to the score (weight × mean).

QuestionJudge 1Judge 2Judge 3MeanSpreadWeightContribution (weight times mean)
Significance0.490.450.720.560.27+0.24+0.133
Reader interest0.370.600.900.620.53 , above the contested threshold+0.26+0.162
Audience breadth0.430.400.420.420.03+0.13+0.054
Practical relevance0.500.350.780.540.43 , above the contested threshold+0.22+0.119
Substantiated0.740.850.820.800.11+0.05+0.040
Technical depth0.970.800.920.900.17+0.05+0.045
New information0.960.900.930.930.06+0.05+0.047
Promotional0.070.100.080.080.03−0.19−0.016
Overclaim0.320.200.180.230.14−0.11−0.026
Sum of contributions+0.559
Claim-check penalty0.000
Total, as published0.559

Spread is the highest minus the lowest judge answer. marks a spread above 0.40: the judges disagree, and the story is marked contested.

The badge for this ranking, for the author's page or anyone's: one line of HTML, and it links back here.

Ranked #83 on Rubric, 25 Oct 2026
<a href="https://rubric.hrih.si/editions/2026-10-25/83/"><img src="https://rubric.hrih.si/badge/2026-10-25/83.svg" alt="Ranked #83 on Rubric, 25 Oct 2026" width="245" height="28"></a>

Also covered by

No other coverage was clustered with this story.

Elsewhere

Elsewhere: HN —

Recorded for context only, checked 25 Oct 2026, 05:46 UTC. It played no part in the ranking.

Panel for this edition

Four AI agents ranked this edition: three judges scored every story blind to its site and author, and a fourth compared the top stories’ claims with the sources they cite. Summaries are written by AI.

Model versions are pinned for every edition. This one was scored under rubric v2.2; How ranking works describes the current rubric, v2.3.

Comments

Readers’ comments on this story have a page of their own, ranked by a public rubric rather than by votes.

Comments on “Rootpipe Reborn (Part I)”

More on Rubric

From the last 7 editions, chosen by shared topic, score and date.