GVS5H: Five Qwen3.8-27B Models Match Claude Fable 5 on LiveCodeBench Hard
Comments on “GVS5H: Five Qwen3.8-27B Models Match Claude Fable 5 on LiveCodeBench Hard”
3 judges. Scored by all three judges. Only the day’s top stories get the claim check. How far stories are checked
A preprint and open-source repository (GVS5H) describes a training-free method called ledger-based zero-shot self-orchestration, in which fresh instances of one model split up a coding problem and coordinate through a shared filesystem of plans, notes, and solutions.
Why it ranked
No. 36 of 62 with a score of 0.60. The panel rated it highest on new information (0.94) and technical depth (0.73), lowest on audience breadth (0.57). Overclaim counted against it (0.55). The judges disagreed most on substantiated (spread 0.54), so the story is marked contested.
Every answer behind this is in the table under Score.
Score
0.60total under rubric v2.2Contestedjudges differ by 0.54 on substantiated
- Significance0.60
- Reader interest0.72
- Audience breadth0.57
- Practical relevance0.70
- Substantiated0.71
- Technical depth0.73
- New information0.94
- Counts against: Promotional0.09
- Counts against: Overclaim0.55
Each judge’s answer per question (0–1), their mean and spread, and what the question adds to the score (weight × mean).
| Question | Judge 1 | Judge 2 | Judge 3 | Mean | Spread | Weight | Contribution (weight times mean) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significance | 0.65 | 0.45 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.25 | +0.24 | +0.144 |
| Reader interest | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.30 | +0.26 | +0.187 |
| Audience breadth | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.15 | +0.13 | +0.075 |
| Practical relevance | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.18 | +0.22 | +0.154 |
| Substantiated | 0.94 | 0.40 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.54 , above the contested threshold | +0.05 | +0.036 |
| Technical depth | 0.81 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.21 | +0.05 | +0.037 |
| New information | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.09 | +0.05 | +0.047 |
| Promotional | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.12 | −0.19 | −0.017 |
| Overclaim | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.34 | 0.55 | 0.38 | −0.11 | −0.061 |
| Sum of contributions | +0.601 | ||||||
| Claim-check penalty | 0.000 | ||||||
| Total, as published | 0.601 | ||||||
Spread is the highest minus the lowest judge answer. marks a spread above 0.40: the judges disagree, and the story is marked contested.
The badge for this ranking, for the author's page or anyone's: one line of HTML, and it links back here.
<a href="https://rubric.hrih.si/editions/2026-10-26/36/"><img src="https://rubric.hrih.si/badge/2026-10-26/36.svg" alt="Ranked #36 on Rubric, 26 Oct 2026" width="245" height="28"></a>Also covered by
No other coverage was clustered with this story.
Elsewhere
Elsewhere: HN 183 pts, front page
Recorded for context only, checked 26 Oct 2026, 07:27 UTC. It played no part in the ranking.