An American Answer to China's Open Si Models: A Safe Harbor for Open Weights
Comments on “An American Answer to China's Open Si Models: A Safe Harbor for Open Weights”
3 judges. Scored by all three judges. Only the day’s top stories get the claim check. How far stories are checked
Manhattan Institute proposes trading an antitrust safe harbor for leading American AI labs, which would let them coordinate on security and anti-distillation efforts at the frontier, for a commitment to release capable open-weight versions of their models on a predictable schedule after independent risk evaluations.
Why it ranked
No. 38 of 62 with a score of 0.60. The panel rated it highest on new information (0.85) and audience breadth (0.77), lowest on technical depth (0.41).
Every answer behind this is in the table under Score.
Score
0.60total under rubric v2.2
- Significance0.66
- Reader interest0.75
- Audience breadth0.77
- Practical relevance0.56
- Substantiated0.62
- Technical depth0.41
- New information0.85
- Counts against: Promotional0.11
- Counts against: Overclaim0.49
Each judge’s answer per question (0–1), their mean and spread, and what the question adds to the score (weight × mean).
| Question | Judge 1 | Judge 2 | Judge 3 | Mean | Spread | Weight | Contribution (weight times mean) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significance | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.23 | +0.24 | +0.159 |
| Reader interest | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.34 | +0.26 | +0.194 |
| Audience breadth | 0.89 | 0.60 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.29 | +0.13 | +0.100 |
| Practical relevance | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.27 | +0.22 | +0.123 |
| Substantiated | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.19 | +0.05 | +0.031 |
| Technical depth | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.18 | +0.05 | +0.021 |
| New information | 0.95 | 0.60 | 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.39 | +0.05 | +0.042 |
| Promotional | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.09 | −0.19 | −0.021 |
| Overclaim | 0.49 | 0.35 | 0.62 | 0.49 | 0.27 | −0.11 | −0.054 |
| Sum of contributions | +0.595 | ||||||
| Claim-check penalty | 0.000 | ||||||
| Total, as published | 0.595 | ||||||
Spread is the highest minus the lowest judge answer. marks a spread above 0.40: the judges disagree, and the story is marked contested.
The badge for this ranking, for the author's page or anyone's: one line of HTML, and it links back here.
<a href="https://rubric.hrih.si/editions/2026-10-26/38/"><img src="https://rubric.hrih.si/badge/2026-10-26/38.svg" alt="Ranked #38 on Rubric, 26 Oct 2026" width="245" height="28"></a>Also covered by
No other coverage was clustered with this story.
Elsewhere
Elsewhere: HN 1 pts, not on front page
Recorded for context only, checked 26 Oct 2026, 07:27 UTC. It played no part in the ranking.