Papers with Code is now open-source
Comments on “Papers with Code is now open-source”
3 judges. Scored by all three judges. Only the day’s top stories get the claim check. How far stories are checked
Papers with Code, the research catalog Meta retired in 2025, has been released as open source under Apache 2.0 by Hugging Face. The project recreates the original site, offering linked papers, code, models, datasets, tasks, and benchmark leaderboards, with automated imports from Hugging Face, arXiv, and GitHub, a REST API…
Why it ranked
No. 41 of 155 with a score of 0.64. The panel rated it highest on new information (0.93) and substantiated (0.77), lowest on audience breadth (0.56). The judges disagreed most on technical depth (spread 0.46), so the story is marked contested.
- AI judgeJudge 2claude-haiku-5-5
- Open-source release of a widely used AI research catalog with API and technical stack details; useful to ML builders, though the project is a recreation of a retired service with modest broader significance.
- AI judgeJudge 3gpt-5.6-luna
- A substantial open-source release recreating a widely used AI research catalog, with architecture, APIs, search, data workflows, deployment details, and setup instructions. It is highly relevant and actionable, though primarily a project announcement.
Each judge wrote its line after answering the rubric, with the site and the author still hidden. Every answer behind this is in the table under Score.
Score
0.64total under rubric v2.2Contestedjudges differ by 0.46 on technical depth
- Significance0.58
- Reader interest0.71
- Audience breadth0.56
- Practical relevance0.72
- Substantiated0.77
- Technical depth0.75
- New information0.93
- Counts against: Promotional0.13
- Counts against: Overclaim0.15
Each judge’s answer per question (0–1), their mean and spread, and what the question adds to the score (weight × mean).
| Question | Judge 1 | Judge 2 | Judge 3 | Mean | Spread | Weight | Contribution (weight times mean) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significance | 0.69 | 0.35 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.35 | +0.24 | +0.140 |
| Reader interest | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.90 | 0.71 | 0.35 | +0.26 | +0.184 |
| Audience breadth | 0.57 | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.22 | +0.13 | +0.073 |
| Practical relevance | 0.86 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.31 | +0.22 | +0.159 |
| Substantiated | 0.90 | 0.55 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.35 | +0.05 | +0.038 |
| Technical depth | 0.96 | 0.50 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.46 , above the contested threshold | +0.05 | +0.038 |
| New information | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.08 | +0.05 | +0.047 |
| Promotional | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 | −0.19 | −0.025 |
| Overclaim | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.20 | −0.11 | −0.017 |
| Sum of contributions | +0.637 | ||||||
| Claim-check penalty | 0.000 | ||||||
| Total, as published | 0.636 | ||||||
Spread is the highest minus the lowest judge answer. marks a spread above 0.40: the judges disagree, and the story is marked contested.
The badge for this ranking, for the author's page or anyone's: one line of HTML, and it links back here.
<a href="https://rubric.hrih.si/editions/2026-10-28/41/"><img src="https://rubric.hrih.si/badge/2026-10-28/41.svg" alt="Ranked #41 on Rubric, 28 Oct 2026" width="245" height="28"></a>Also covered by
No other coverage was clustered with this story.
Elsewhere
Elsewhere: HN 2 pts, not on front page
Recorded for context only, checked 28 Oct 2026, 06:47 UTC. It played no part in the ranking.