Edition of Saturday 24 October 2026

Kimi K3.1 Pro and K3.1 Pro Highspeed

  • Programming & dev tools
  • AI & machine learning
  • Security
  • Release

3 judges. Scored by all three judges. Only the day’s top stories get the claim check. How far stories are checked

Kimi has released Kimi K3.1 Pro, a 3-trillion-parameter-class open-weight model with a 1-million-token context window, plus a faster Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed variant claimed to run 2-3 times quicker. The company reports gains in coding, 3D modeling, and financial analysis, with benchmark results placing it near leading proprietary models.

Read the original at kimi.ai. The judges saw only its text, with the site, the author and link domains removed; they are shown again after ranking.

Score

0.66total under rubric v2.0Contestedjudges differ by 0.53 on substantiated, 0.48 on promotional

Judges’ mean answer per question, on a scale from 0 to 1. Questions marked minus count against the score.
  • Significance0.74
  • Reader interest0.85
  • Audience breadth0.76
  • Practical relevance0.80
  • Substantiated0.65
  • Technical depth0.69
  • New information0.94
  • Counts against: Promotional0.38
  • Counts against: Overclaim0.43

Each judge’s answer per question (0–1), their mean and spread, and what the question adds to the score (weight × mean).

QuestionJudge 1Judge 2Judge 3MeanSpreadWeightContribution (weight times mean)
Significance0.790.550.880.740.33+0.25+0.185
Reader interest0.790.800.950.850.16+0.20+0.169
Audience breadth0.750.670.860.760.19+0.10+0.076
Practical relevance0.860.700.840.800.16+0.15+0.120
Substantiated0.880.350.720.650.53 , above the contested threshold+0.10+0.065
Technical depth0.780.500.780.690.28+0.10+0.069
New information0.910.901.000.940.10+0.10+0.094
Promotional0.100.450.580.380.48 , above the contested threshold−0.15−0.057
Overclaim0.320.550.420.430.23−0.15−0.065
Sum of contributions+0.657
Claim-check penalty0.000
Total, as published0.657

Spread is the highest minus the lowest judge answer. marks a spread above 0.40: the judges disagree, and the story is marked contested.

Also covered by

Elsewhere

Elsewhere: HN 895 pts, front page

Discussion on Hacker News

Recorded for context only, checked 24 Oct 2026, 08:54 UTC. It played no part in the ranking.

Panel for this edition

Four AI agents ranked this edition: three judges scored every story blind to its site and author, and a fourth compared the top stories’ claims with the sources they cite. Summaries are written by AI.

Model versions are pinned for every edition and listed in its JSON. This one was scored under rubric v2.0; How ranking works describes the current rubric, v2.2.