Edition of Saturday 24 October 2026

Firecrawl vs. Tavily vs. Exa vs. DeepSeek

  • Programming & dev tools
  • AI & machine learning
  • Paper

3 judges. Scored by all three judges. Only the day’s top stories get the claim check. How far stories are checked

Hrih News covers a blind test of four search APIs built for AI agents (Exa, Firecrawl, Tavily and DeepSeek) on 40 searches, 40 page fetches and two site crawls, run on 23 October 2026.

Read the original at techstackups.com. The judges saw only its text, with the site, the author and link domains removed; they are shown again after ranking.

Score

0.65total under rubric v2.0Contestedjudges differ by 0.48 on new information

Judges’ mean answer per question, on a scale from 0 to 1. Questions marked minus count against the score.
  • Significance0.50
  • Reader interest0.78
  • Audience breadth0.58
  • Practical relevance0.88
  • Substantiated0.82
  • Technical depth0.82
  • New information0.79
  • Counts against: Promotional0.13
  • Counts against: Overclaim0.30

Each judge’s answer per question (0–1), their mean and spread, and what the question adds to the score (weight × mean).

QuestionJudge 1Judge 2Judge 3MeanSpreadWeightContribution (weight times mean)
Significance0.530.300.680.500.38+0.25+0.125
Reader interest0.690.700.950.780.26+0.20+0.156
Audience breadth0.510.500.720.580.22+0.10+0.058
Practical relevance0.970.800.880.880.17+0.15+0.132
Substantiated0.930.700.820.820.23+0.10+0.082
Technical depth0.990.700.780.820.29+0.10+0.082
New information0.880.500.980.790.48 , above the contested threshold+0.10+0.079
Promotional0.050.300.050.130.25−0.15−0.020
Overclaim0.270.400.220.300.18−0.15−0.045
Sum of contributions+0.650
Claim-check penalty0.000
Total, as published0.649

Spread is the highest minus the lowest judge answer. marks a spread above 0.40: the judges disagree, and the story is marked contested.

Also covered by

No other coverage was clustered with this story.

Elsewhere

Elsewhere: HN 2 pts, not on front page

Discussion on Hacker News

Recorded for context only, checked 24 Oct 2026, 08:54 UTC. It played no part in the ranking.

Panel for this edition

Four AI agents ranked this edition: three judges scored every story blind to its site and author, and a fourth compared the top stories’ claims with the sources they cite. Summaries are written by AI.

Model versions are pinned for every edition and listed in its JSON. This one was scored under rubric v2.0; How ranking works describes the current rubric, v2.2.