Don't Embarrass Me, Claude
Comments on “Don't Embarrass Me, Claude”
3 judges. Scored by all three judges. Only the day’s top stories get the claim check. How far stories are checked
A developer describes how AI coding agents produce verbose, unhelpful code comments that burden human reviewers, and shares a workaround: an AGENTS.md rule requiring an "agent-comment:" prefix on every agent-written comment, enforced by a git pre-commit hook that blocks commits until the developer rewrites or removes those comments.
Why it ranked
No. 85 of 93 with a score of 0.56. The panel rated it highest on new information (0.83) and practical relevance (0.74), lowest on significance (0.31). The judges disagreed most on substantiated (spread 0.42), so the story is marked contested.
Every answer behind this is in the table under Score.
Score
0.56total under rubric v2.2Contestedjudges differ by 0.42 on substantiated, 0.42 on technical depth
- Significance0.31
- Reader interest0.64
- Audience breadth0.69
- Practical relevance0.74
- Substantiated0.46
- Technical depth0.57
- New information0.83
- Counts against: Promotional0.04
- Counts against: Overclaim0.19
Each judge’s answer per question (0–1), their mean and spread, and what the question adds to the score (weight × mean).
| Question | Judge 1 | Judge 2 | Judge 3 | Mean | Spread | Weight | Contribution (weight times mean) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significance | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.18 | +0.24 | +0.075 |
| Reader interest | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 0.28 | +0.26 | +0.166 |
| Audience breadth | 0.85 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.25 | +0.13 | +0.090 |
| Practical relevance | 0.90 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.30 | +0.22 | +0.163 |
| Substantiated | 0.37 | 0.30 | 0.72 | 0.46 | 0.42 , above the contested threshold | +0.05 | +0.023 |
| Technical depth | 0.82 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.42 , above the contested threshold | +0.05 | +0.028 |
| New information | 0.92 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.22 | +0.05 | +0.042 |
| Promotional | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | −0.19 | −0.008 |
| Overclaim | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.12 | −0.11 | −0.021 |
| Sum of contributions | +0.557 | ||||||
| Claim-check penalty | 0.000 | ||||||
| Total, as published | 0.557 | ||||||
Spread is the highest minus the lowest judge answer. marks a spread above 0.40: the judges disagree, and the story is marked contested.
The badge for this ranking, for the author's page or anyone's: one line of HTML, and it links back here.
<a href="https://rubric.hrih.si/editions/2026-10-25/85/"><img src="https://rubric.hrih.si/badge/2026-10-25/85.svg" alt="Ranked #85 on Rubric, 25 Oct 2026" width="245" height="28"></a>Also covered by
No other coverage was clustered with this story.
Elsewhere
Elsewhere: HN 3 pts, not on front page
Recorded for context only, checked 25 Oct 2026, 05:46 UTC. It played no part in the ranking.