From the Top to the Bottom; Tracking down CVE-2017-7149
Comments on “From the Top to the Bottom; Tracking down CVE-2017-7149”
3 judges. Scored by all three judges. Only the day’s top stories get the claim check. How far stories are checked
Patreon-supported blog post by Objective-See walks through reverse engineering macOS High Sierra's Disk Utility from the UI down to find the cause of CVE-2017-7149, a flaw that stored an encrypted APFS volume's password as its password hint, exposing it to local attackers.
Why it ranked
No. 86 of 93 with a score of 0.55. The panel rated it highest on technical depth (0.93) and substantiated (0.88), lowest on audience breadth (0.41). The judges disagreed most on new information (spread 0.79), so the story is marked contested.
Every answer behind this is in the table under Score.
Score
0.55total under rubric v2.2Contestedjudges differ by 0.49 on reader interest, 0.79 on new information
- Significance0.54
- Reader interest0.60
- Audience breadth0.41
- Practical relevance0.54
- Substantiated0.88
- Technical depth0.93
- New information0.67
- Counts against: Promotional0.06
- Counts against: Overclaim0.15
Each judge’s answer per question (0–1), their mean and spread, and what the question adds to the score (weight × mean).
| Question | Judge 1 | Judge 2 | Judge 3 | Mean | Spread | Weight | Contribution (weight times mean) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significance | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.27 | +0.24 | +0.130 |
| Reader interest | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.84 | 0.60 | 0.49 , above the contested threshold | +0.26 | +0.155 |
| Audience breadth | 0.32 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.18 | +0.13 | +0.053 |
| Practical relevance | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.54 | 0.23 | +0.22 | +0.119 |
| Substantiated | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.08 | +0.05 | +0.044 |
| Technical depth | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.10 | +0.05 | +0.047 |
| New information | 0.94 | 0.15 | 0.93 | 0.67 | 0.79 , above the contested threshold | +0.05 | +0.034 |
| Promotional | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.04 | −0.19 | −0.011 |
| Overclaim | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.12 | −0.11 | −0.016 |
| Sum of contributions | +0.554 | ||||||
| Claim-check penalty | 0.000 | ||||||
| Total, as published | 0.554 | ||||||
Spread is the highest minus the lowest judge answer. marks a spread above 0.40: the judges disagree, and the story is marked contested.
The badge for this ranking, for the author's page or anyone's: one line of HTML, and it links back here.
<a href="https://rubric.hrih.si/editions/2026-10-25/86/"><img src="https://rubric.hrih.si/badge/2026-10-25/86.svg" alt="Ranked #86 on Rubric, 25 Oct 2026" width="245" height="28"></a>Also covered by
No other coverage was clustered with this story.
Elsewhere
Elsewhere: HN —
Recorded for context only, checked 25 Oct 2026, 05:46 UTC. It played no part in the ranking.