Every story from this week’s editions, in one list by score. The score comes from the AI judges, who read each story’s text with the site and the author hidden. Each title leads to the story’s page, with every answer they gave.
Week 44 of 20267 editions748 storiesRubric v2.2, v2.3Final
Editions: Mon 26 · Tue 27 · Wed 28 · Thu 29 · Fri 30 · Sat 31 · Sun 1
Ranked by score · 20 of 748 stories
No. 1Score 0.83
Judge 2 Detailed supply-chain security investigation of npm and GitHub compromise with decoded payloads, IOCs and remediation; highly actionable and substantiated, though some attribution remains inferential.
No. 2Score 0.81
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.95) and practical relevance (0.93), lowest on audience breadth (0.71).
No. 3Score 0.81
Judge 2 Strong on-topic security research showing AI models exploiting pre-release Firefox fixes; well-described methodology and cost, though central claims rest on the authors' own unverified experiments.
No. 4Score 0.80
Judge 2 Detailed, well-substantiated engineering write-up of a cross-user account takeover chain in a major AI product; highly relevant to builders, with strong technical depth and new information, though the framing is somewhat dramatic.
No. 5Score 0.78
Judge 2 Detailed, data-backed incident follow-up on a compromised CA with weak keys; major security impact and actionable patching guidance for builders, with substantial technical detail and largely unique information.
No. 6Score 0.78
Judge 2 Concrete, actionable security advisory on macOS developer tools trusting compromised eMudhra CA certificates; well-evidenced with reproducible tests, though it is a follow-up to an ongoing incident and mostly relevant to security-minded builders.
No. 7Score 0.78
The panel Rated highest on practical relevance (0.86) and substantiated (0.84), lowest on technical depth (0.73).
No. 8Score 0.78
Judge 2 Detailed, technically rich account of AI-discovered exploit chains in Chrome, Safari, Android, Windows and Linux; highly relevant to builders and security, with some vendor-sourced claims and promotional closing about a program.
No. 9Score 0.77
Judge 2 Detailed security research on a malicious Hugging Face campaign exploiting trust_remote_code, with extensive IOCs and reproducible analysis; some promotional closing text and dense length.}
No. 10Score 0.77
Judge 2 Detailed security research on AI coding tools' embedded browsers with reproducible exploit details, vendor patch status, and a practical grep-based detection method; mostly self-reported testing, some vendor claims unverified.
No. 11Score 0.77
The panel Rated highest on practical relevance (0.95) and reader interest (0.85), lowest on new information (0.49).
No. 12Score 0.77
Judge 2 Major security incident with strong onchain evidence and technical detail on EIP-7702 abuse and signing compromise; largely new relative to recent stories, though it is a crypto-industry event with narrower builder relevance in parts.
No. 13Score 0.77
Judge 2 Detailed technical incident analysis of a backdoored official IDE extension with IOCs and remediation; highly relevant to builders and security teams, strongly substantiated, and new relative to recent coverage.
No. 14Score 0.77
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.94) and new information (0.93), lowest on audience breadth (0.67).
No. 15Score 0.77
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.91) and new information (0.89), lowest on audience breadth (0.66).
No. 16Score 0.76
Judge 2 Critical Linux kernel TCP use-after-free with detailed fix, distro status, and mitigations; highly actionable security news, with a promotional consulting footer and a few sensational framing points.
No. 17Score 0.76
Judge 2 Detailed, well-sourced post-mortem of a 2023 ChatGPT data exposure caused by a redis-py async cancellation bug; practical lessons for builders, though the incident is older and not new in the last-7-day list beyond the Garante follow-up.}
No. 18Score 0.75
Judge 2 Detailed, technically specific exploit-chain write-up on widely used firewall software with vendor-verified claims; strong security relevance, though the vendor-sourced framing and attribution claims limit substantiation and add some promotional tone.
No. 19Score 0.75
Judge 2 Widely deployed Brotli decoder vulnerability with an actionable affected-package inventory. Substantiated by version ranges and upstream fix, though the exploitability detail is thin and the text is partly list-driven marketing-adjacent framing.
No. 20Score 0.75
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.95) and reader interest (0.87), lowest on significance (0.71).
The top 5 of 379 stories
No. 1Score 0.83
No. 2Score 0.80
No. 3Score 0.78
No. 4Score 0.78
No. 5Score 0.77
The top 5 of 423 stories
No. 1Score 0.81
No. 2Score 0.80
No. 3Score 0.78
No. 4Score 0.77
No. 5Score 0.77
The top 5 of 248 stories
No. 1Score 0.83
No. 2Score 0.81
No. 3Score 0.81
No. 4Score 0.80
No. 5Score 0.78
The top 5 of 138 stories
No. 1Score 0.83
No. 2Score 0.81
No. 3Score 0.77
No. 4Score 0.77
No. 5Score 0.76
The top 5 of 65 stories
No. 1Score 0.78
No. 2Score 0.77
No. 3Score 0.76
No. 4Score 0.75
No. 5Score 0.75
The top 5 of 51 stories
No. 1Score 0.72
No. 2Score 0.68
No. 3Score 0.67
No. 4Score 0.67
No. 5Score 0.66
The top 5 of 61 stories
No. 1Score 0.75
No. 2Score 0.74
No. 3Score 0.73
No. 4Score 0.73
No. 5Score 0.72
The top 5 of 14 stories
No. 1Score 0.70
No. 2Score 0.64
No. 3Score 0.64
No. 4Score 0.61
No. 5Score 0.61
The top 5 of 6 stories
No. 1Score 0.61
No. 2Score 0.58
No. 3Score 0.57
No. 4Score 0.56
No. 5Score 0.56
The top 5 of 23 stories
No. 1Score 0.68
No. 2Score 0.65
No. 3Score 0.65
No. 4Score 0.65
No. 5Score 0.64
The top 5 of 6 stories
No. 1Score 0.77
No. 2Score 0.66
No. 3Score 0.63
No. 4Score 0.61
No. 5Score 0.58
The top 5 of 41 stories
No. 1Score 0.72
No. 2Score 0.72
No. 3Score 0.70
No. 4Score 0.66
No. 5Score 0.65
1 story
No. 1Score 0.60
A story the pipeline marked as a close repeat of one listed above it appears once here; its day’s edition lists both. A story can belong to several topics. This week mixes rubric v2.2 and v2.3, and scores under different versions are not strictly comparable. How ranking works