No. 1Score 0.83
The attack chain behind the v1.107.0 LiteLLM release
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.95) and substantiated (0.94), lowest on audience breadth (0.65).
Every story from this week’s editions, in one list by score. The score comes from the AI judges, who read each story’s text with the site and the author hidden. Each title leads to the story’s page, with every answer they gave.
Week 43 of 20262 editions338 storiesRubric v2.0, v2.2Final
Ranked by score · 20 of 338 stories
No. 1Score 0.83
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.95) and substantiated (0.94), lowest on audience breadth (0.65).
No. 2Score 0.81
The panel Rated highest on practical relevance (0.95) and new information (0.94), lowest on substantiated (0.71).
No. 3Score 0.80
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.95) and new information (0.94), lowest on reader interest (0.76).
No. 4Score 0.76
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.93) and substantiated (0.91), lowest on audience breadth (0.73).
No. 5Score 0.76
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.94) and substantiated (0.92), lowest on audience breadth (0.63).
No. 6Score 0.75
The panel Rated highest on practical relevance (0.97) and new information (0.91), lowest on substantiated (0.69).
No. 7Score 0.74
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.93) and new information (0.91), lowest on significance (0.61).
No. 8Score 0.74
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.93) and substantiated (0.91), lowest on audience breadth (0.62).
No. 9Score 0.74
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.97) and new information (0.94), lowest on audience breadth (0.69).
No. 10Score 0.74
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.92) and substantiated (0.91), lowest on audience breadth (0.59).
No. 11Score 0.74
The panel Rated highest on practical relevance (0.92) and technical depth (0.91), lowest on significance (0.59).
No. 12Score 0.74
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.96) and reader interest (0.87), lowest on audience breadth (0.55).
No. 13Score 0.73
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.96) and substantiated (0.93), lowest on audience breadth (0.63).
No. 14Score 0.73
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.95) and substantiated (0.81), lowest on audience breadth (0.66).
No. 15Score 0.73
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.98) and new information (0.92), lowest on audience breadth (0.45).
No. 16Score 0.73
The panel Rated highest on practical relevance (0.87) and reader interest (0.86), lowest on audience breadth (0.59).
No. 17Score 0.72
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.89) and substantiated (0.88), lowest on audience breadth (0.68).
No. 18Score 0.72
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.94) and substantiated (0.84), lowest on practical relevance (0.67).
No. 19Score 0.72
The panel Rated highest on new information (0.94) and reader interest (0.85), lowest on audience breadth (0.55).
No. 20Score 0.72
The panel Rated highest on technical depth (0.91) and substantiated (0.90), lowest on audience breadth (0.58).
The top 5 of 126 stories
No. 1Score 0.83
No. 2Score 0.81
No. 3Score 0.76
No. 4Score 0.75
No. 5Score 0.74
The top 5 of 225 stories
No. 1Score 0.83
No. 2Score 0.74
No. 3Score 0.74
No. 4Score 0.74
No. 5Score 0.74
The top 5 of 106 stories
No. 1Score 0.83
No. 2Score 0.81
No. 3Score 0.80
No. 4Score 0.76
No. 5Score 0.76
The top 5 of 46 stories
No. 1Score 0.83
No. 2Score 0.81
No. 3Score 0.75
No. 4Score 0.73
No. 5Score 0.73
The top 5 of 17 stories
No. 1Score 0.81
No. 2Score 0.80
No. 3Score 0.72
No. 4Score 0.72
No. 5Score 0.72
The top 5 of 18 stories
No. 1Score 0.72
No. 2Score 0.71
No. 3Score 0.70
No. 4Score 0.70
No. 5Score 0.69
The top 5 of 20 stories
No. 1Score 0.74
No. 2Score 0.74
No. 3Score 0.70
No. 4Score 0.69
No. 5Score 0.68
3 stories
No. 1Score 0.61
No. 2Score 0.56
No. 3Score 0.55
3 stories
No. 1Score 0.66
No. 2Score 0.62
No. 3Score 0.60
3 stories
No. 1Score 0.58
No. 2Score 0.57
No. 3Score 0.57
3 stories
No. 1Score 0.66
No. 2Score 0.63
No. 3Score 0.59
The top 5 of 16 stories
No. 1Score 0.74
No. 2Score 0.74
No. 3Score 0.72
No. 4Score 0.67
No. 5Score 0.67
1 story
No. 1Score 0.59
A story the pipeline marked as a close repeat of one listed above it appears once here; its day’s edition lists both. A story can belong to several topics. This week mixes rubric v2.0 and v2.2, and scores under different versions are not strictly comparable. How ranking works